Asking the World: Generalist Physical Reasoning through Agentic World Modeling and Probing

Shenxiang Zeng1,*, Chen Yang1,*, Peiyao Chen1, Guohui Zhang1, Jiansheng Fan1,†, Chen Wang1,†

1 Tsinghua University

* Equal contribution† Corresponding authors

Abstract

Physical reasoning requires inferring latent properties and dynamics beyond direct observation.

Asking the World (ATW) constructs and interrogates task-relevant executable worlds through adaptive World Modeling and World Probing, determining how to model and probe according to the scene and question.

PolyWorld Engine supports diverse materials and coupled interactions, while system identification recovers task-relevant dynamics. The resulting world becomes an active workspace for question-directed physical experiments, enabling execution-grounded generalist physical reasoning.

Read the full abstract

Physical reasoning from video requires inferring latent physical properties and dynamics beyond direct observation. Direct VLM inference remains unreliable on complex physical tasks without explicit modeling and validation, while predefined tool pipelines rely on task- and domain-specific priors that limit generalization across materials, dynamics, and reasoning tasks. We introduce Asking the World (ATW), a generalist agent that constructs and interrogates task-relevant executable worlds through two adaptive stages: World Modeling calibrates a world from video, while World Probing queries, simulates, and intervenes on it to obtain question-relevant evidence. Rather than prescribing the operations in either stage, ATW determines how to model and probe according to the scene and question. We develop PolyWorld Engine, a lightweight and highly programmable Warp-based multiphysics simulator for constructing and probing worlds with rigid bodies, soft bodies, cloth, ropes, fluids, and their coupled interactions. CEM-based system identification recovers task-relevant dynamics during World Modeling. The resulting world becomes an active workspace for question-directed physical experiments rather than a predetermined downstream tool. We evaluate ATW on CLEVRER, ContPhy, and three real-world scenarios. Using Gemini-3-Flash as its base VLM, ATW achieves 80.82% overall per-question accuracy on CLEVRER, improving direct Gemini-3-Flash by 46.50 points, GPT-5.5 by 13.58 points, and PhysMind by 8.27 points. On ContPhy, it reaches 70.56% overall accuracy, surpassing Gemini-3-Flash by 28.10 points and GPT-5.5 by 3.53 points. Across the three real-world scenarios, ATW achieves 71.67% accuracy, 28.33 points above GPT-5.5. These results establish agentic world modeling and probing as an effective, execution-grounded approach to generalist physical reasoning.

Asking the World in Action

Video Observations
Executable World

Loading scene…

Overview of ATW

ATW constructs and interrogates task-relevant executable worlds through two adaptive stages: World Modeling and World Probing.

A billiards counterfactual: World Modeling corrects a missing mask, tracks poses, and fits dynamics; World Probing removes the brown ball and queries collision events to answer the question.

World Modeling

Selects question-relevant entities, recovers geometry and motion, and fits physical parameters. Feedback revises object bindings and physical representations before the agent commits an executable world.

World Probing

Queries properties, simulates trajectories, and tests interventions in the committed world. Execution feedback refines subsequent probes without reopening World Modeling or altering the base world.

Main Results

CLEVRER

80.82%Overall per-question accuracy

CLEVRER · 1,000 validation videos · Accuracy (%)

MethodExplanatoryPredictiveCounterfactualOverall
per ques.per opt.per ques.per opt.per ques.per opt.per ques.per opt.
Baselines
Random7.1949.3325.4049.719.7550.0211.2649.69
Blind Gemini-3-Flash27.0064.6424.6848.9210.0750.1319.2156.31
Foundation VLMs
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B53.1975.8440.4062.1222.1761.7937.5267.92
GLM-4.6V39.3373.7563.6466.7424.3158.7036.6866.02
Gemini-3-Flash50.3274.6642.7153.4616.6358.3834.3264.97
Gemini-3.1-Pro60.9079.1761.7671.2825.3763.5045.4771.06
GPT-4o36.7670.4835.6454.9815.5756.5427.2962.44
GPT-5.577.2189.5585.7190.6951.3376.7467.2483.66
Training-Based Methods
VideoRFT16.6661.9839.2547.4015.3554.9819.7457.28
Video-R132.7971.1441.5646.2519.6259.1028.4363.08
VideoThinker-R117.5363.6041.5642.5015.1453.7120.3756.92
Chain-of-Frames44.7177.2684.4287.8833.4870.8446.2175.29
Training-Free Methods
VideoAgent34.4261.5514.2948.567.5751.6119.3955.63
STAR55.5878.6224.2457.147.5753.4729.4664.75
PhysMind76.9787.3866.9682.3270.5888.0872.5587.22
ATW (Ours)83.8792.3188.6091.4175.1690.2980.8291.28

ContPhy

70.56%Overall accuracy

World Modeling replaces a rigid-body hypothesis with a soft-body model after observing deformation. World Probing corrects an intervention to target the intended cyan wall.

ContPhy · 600 videos · 1,950 questions · Accuracy (%)

MethodPropertyPredictiveCounterfactualGoal-drivenOverall
Baselines
Random40.5331.5012.9213.9028.36
Blind Gemini-3-Flash47.4741.2623.1629.3437.90
Foundation VLMs
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B58.8046.5430.5127.4145.03
Gemini-3-Flash60.0043.9023.1622.3942.46
GPT-5.575.4750.8169.4969.1167.03
Training-Based Methods
Video-R1-7B43.4734.1511.1415.4429.95
Chain-of-Frames-8B50.2748.1710.2420.8536.62
Training-Free Methods
ATW (Ours)81.7362.2063.0367.1870.56

Real-world

Video Observations
Executable World
Loading videos…

Counterfactual reasoning

Per-question accuracy (%)

Gemini-3-Flash20.00%
GPT-5.535.00%
ATW (Ours)85.00%

Ablation Studies

Executable worlds and adaptive reasoning

Executable worlds provide substantial gains. Feedback-guided revision adds 6.90 points on CLEVRER and 8.92 on ContPhy over Single-pass World Model.

Per-question accuracy for Video-only VLM, Perception-only, Single-pass World Model, and Full ATW. Overall CLEVRER: 35.40, 42.07, 75.40, 82.30 percent. Overall ContPhy: 47.08, 51.38, 59.08, 68.00 percent.

Gemini-3-Flash · CLEVRER and ContPhy ablation subsets

BibTeX

@misc{zeng2026askingworld,
  title = {Asking the World: Generalist Physical Reasoning through Agentic World Modeling and Probing},
  author = {Shenxiang Zeng and Chen Yang and Peiyao Chen and Guohui Zhang and Jiansheng Fan and Chen Wang},
  year = {2026},
  eprint = {2609.39135},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass = {cs.CV},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39135}
}